Today in letters to the editor of the Indo, Cian Cafferky and Anthony Bates are appalled by Kevin Myers' call to  stop Muslims entering the country.  But their hearts have overruled  their minds. Both responses play on our emotions, while neither answers  the fundamental question that Mr Myers asked : given the extreme  difficulty posed by Muslim immigration to England, "what rational  justification is there for enlarging our Islamic population?"
  To be frank, I have grave difficulty with Mr Myers' proposal because  it punishes the many for the sins of the few. And when it comes to the  perpetrators of the horrible massacres we've seen in Spain, Britain, and  elsewhere, we really are talking about the few. But we cannot ignore the  shocking radicalisation of Muslim communities in Britain and France. As  Mr Myers points out, when Muslim attitudes in these countries were  surveyed, the results were frightening.
  Liberals will cry that Muslims in France are unemployed or suffer  discrimination. Those in Britain are angry at the War in Iraq. All of  this is true, but none of it justifies the kind of anger at and raw  hatred of the west that we've seen in these communities. Western  countries have at various times wronged much of the Muslim world, but we  know too that many British Muslims come from countries where all people,  Muslim or not, are treated miserably and eke out short, impoverished  lives. But for some reason, even grotesque Muslim regimes are spared the  fury that is reserved for the West.
   There is no reason to believe that we could do any better at  integrating our Muslims. When the economy slumps, as it will one day,  they too might suffer discrimination or deprivation. They might be angry  at our unquestioning support of American foreign policy, or a future war  for that matter. In that case, is there not a very real chance that our  Muslims too would begin to hate us? In such circumstances, the horrid,  loathsome fundamentalism that we've seen elsewhere could catch on here.  As elsewhere, in the fertile soil of anger, it would flourish. Is this a  horror we'd rather avert now, or deal with later?
  Mr Myer's has suggested one way to prevent the problem. Those who  attack him have not suggested an alternative. Until they do, his  approach, though flawed and unpalatable, stands as the only rational way  to avoid what could become a terrible nightmare.
Thursday 19 July 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment